My Pro Street
Pro Street Store Order Status Gallery Classifieds Arcade Motorsports Groups New Rides Get Sponsored Affiliates
Go Back   My Pro Street > General Chat > General Discussion and Debate
Register Top Rides FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

General Discussion and Debate Discuss, Debate, and Converse with other My Pro Street members in a mature, intelligent manner.

Welcome to the My Pro Street community! Register here! - It takes less than 1 minute... we timed it!

By joining you can Create your personal FREE car webpage!, Upload and share pictures FREE, Chat with other members, Ask or share tech advice with other members, and much much more! Here are some sample pages our members have created... it's all FREE!:

mr_240sx | trtrex | birdizzle256 | chipzxb | cobraR | dsm_tuner260 | sagvr4 | M3tor2nR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2007, 05:41 PM   #1
Icepic
lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!
 
Icepic's Avatar
 

My Page | My Pics | My Ads

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 821
Send a message via Yahoo to Icepic
Default DISCUSS: fuel vapor systems are bull !

http://www.fuelvaporcar.com/

if you do the math, this is just hype. gas only has so many btu's and it requires energy to move mass. the 20:1 air fuel ratio would increase gas mileage along with a vapor system, but this car should get no better than 50 mpg. to accelerate 1500 lbs at that rate you would need to burn alot more fuel. plus running that lean would be extremely hot and the engine wouldn't last long, you would have to limit the rpm's to about 5000 to keep the pistons from melting!

but fuel does need to be vaporized before it will burn. so lets discuss this. would heating the fuel to lets say 150 - 200 F before it is injected improve combustion? power?

and what would be any potential drawbacks with the most obvious being pre-detonation without tuning
__________________
3315lbs of scrap metal and plastic. A.K.A. FORD.
Icepic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2007, 07:49 PM   #2
sagvr4
Moderator
 
sagvr4's Avatar
 

My Page | My Pics | My Ads

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,193
Send a message via AIM to sagvr4
Default Re: DISCUSS: fuel vapor systems are bull !

i wish my car weighed 1500 lbs if you think it would need to burn a lot more to move 1500 think about an actual car that weighs 3000
__________________
~Scott
sagvr4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2007, 11:14 AM   #3
Icepic
lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!
 
Icepic's Avatar
 

My Page | My Pics | My Ads

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 821
Send a message via Yahoo to Icepic
Default Re: DISCUSS: fuel vapor systems are bull !

well a motorcycle weighs about 400 lbs and get 50 mpg. an older dirtbike can get as high as 120 mpg if its small. but look at how practical it is, your better off with a motorcycle! you can't haul anything in it.
__________________
3315lbs of scrap metal and plastic. A.K.A. FORD.
Icepic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2007, 12:41 PM   #4
GSRTURBO
Im bringing sexay back
 
GSRTURBO's Avatar
 

My Page | My Pics | My Ads

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,631
Default Re: DISCUSS: fuel vapor systems are bull !

omg 1500 lbs, id kill for that weight in my car haha
__________________
-Brandon
DD '92 Civic VX - B18C1 swap - 8spi t04r


DEANGELO HALL
GSRTURBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 02:31 AM   #5
Velvet Jones
Method 4 Motorsport's Internet Salesman
 
Velvet Jones's Avatar
 

My Page | My Pics | My Ads

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Method 4 Motorsports SF
Posts: 676
Send a message via AIM to Velvet Jones Send a message via Yahoo to Velvet Jones
Default Re: DISCUSS: fuel vapor systems are bull !

anyone would kill to have a 1500 lb car.


as far as heating the gasoline before injecting it, you might as well run kool-aid in the tank, you'd make more power. the colder the fuel, the denser it is. the denser the fuel, the more efficient the burn. the more efficient the burn, better power and mpg.
__________________
FUK SHO LETS GO!

the motto of my sponsors: Oni-moto.com and Garaged Motorsports

cafepress.com/onisf


Velvet Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 01:03 PM   #6
Icepic
lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!
 
Icepic's Avatar
 

My Page | My Pics | My Ads

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 821
Send a message via Yahoo to Icepic
Default Re: DISCUSS: fuel vapor systems are bull !

yes colder fuel is denser, but warm or cold the ecu adds or subtracts the appropriate amount. but for ignition you need heat, fuel and air. granted the fuel is warmed rapidly as the piston compresses the mixture, if it was warmer going in, the explosion would happen a lil more rapidly. gasoline doesn't spontaneously combust until about 500 F but a spark will ignite it at -40 F. if it was heated to about 200 F before being injected it would vaporized much quicker giving a more complete detonation, and would be much cleaner also.

for power you want as much air as possible so you can add more fuel, therefore you want it cooler so it takes less volume. but fuel burns the same reguardless of temp. it's the vapors the burn not the fuel.
__________________
3315lbs of scrap metal and plastic. A.K.A. FORD.
Icepic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 05:29 PM   #7
Velvet Jones
Method 4 Motorsport's Internet Salesman
 
Velvet Jones's Avatar
 

My Page | My Pics | My Ads

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Method 4 Motorsports SF
Posts: 676
Send a message via AIM to Velvet Jones Send a message via Yahoo to Velvet Jones
Default Re: DISCUSS: fuel vapor systems are bull !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icepic View Post
yes colder fuel is denser, but warm or cold the ecu adds or subtracts the appropriate amount. but for ignition you need heat, fuel and air. granted the fuel is warmed rapidly as the piston compresses the mixture, if it was warmer going in, the explosion would happen a lil more rapidly. gasoline doesn't spontaneously combust until about 500 F but a spark will ignite it at -40 F. if it was heated to about 200 F before being injected it would vaporized much quicker giving a more complete detonation, and would be much cleaner also.

for power you want as much air as possible so you can add more fuel, therefore you want it cooler so it takes less volume. but fuel burns the same reguardless of temp. it's the vapors the burn not the fuel.
hmmm...... do you really know what detonation is? its when the fuel is injected and ignites prematurely, before the combustion stroke, and before the spark plug can light. that craks, chips, and melts pistons. detonation is bad, mmmmkay? if you want a melted piston, be my guest. just remember, thats why they make fuel coolers, NOT fuel warmers.....
__________________
FUK SHO LETS GO!

the motto of my sponsors: Oni-moto.com and Garaged Motorsports

cafepress.com/onisf


Velvet Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 05:43 PM   #8
Icepic
lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!
 
Icepic's Avatar
 

My Page | My Pics | My Ads

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 821
Send a message via Yahoo to Icepic
Default Re: DISCUSS: fuel vapor systems are bull !

lol yes thats pre- detonation, but that is most likely to occur at extremely high rpm's or excessive boost. if you have the proper octane rating you shouldn't have to worry about it but that is one potential problem i've thought of. for a daily driver though, it shouldn,t be to much of an issue.
__________________
3315lbs of scrap metal and plastic. A.K.A. FORD.
Icepic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subaru AWD vs other AWD systems trtrex Subaru 0 03-19-2007 08:45 PM
Fuses for systems sh66ter Misc 0 01-20-2007 07:37 AM
You Don't Ever Have To Get Lost Again With New Auto Navigation Systems. demigod Universal Tech Tips and How Tos 0 01-15-2007 12:38 PM
Thats bull! beak Arcade Chat 7 11-21-2006 04:05 PM
NOS (Nitrous Oxide Systems) Questions and Answers admin Forced Induction 0 10-07-2006 02:31 PM


Pro Street Motorsports My Pro Street Community

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2006-2009 Pro Street Online, Inc.